Thursday, September 4, 2008

Mr. Chapman, your bias is showing

Let me get this straight. An effective Governor who also served on a city council and later as mayor...plus was courageous enough to begin saving taxpayer funds by cutting her own salary first, is less qualified for the Vice Presidency than the Senator of a tiny northeast state who has never done anything decisive. A senator who's running mate has never held an executive position, period. What am I missing here? Oh yes, she a true conservative, not just a republican. She went up against the GOP party leadership and committed the worst of sins, she won.
As for all those comments pushing her lack of experience. I would like to see the details on all the accomplishments and experience of Obama and Biden. Longevity in the Senate is not experience for the White House. The buck doesn't stop with you, so Palin is more qualified than Biden. As for Obama, please...I had to stop typing to giggle...a girl scout has more experience than he does.
Let's move on the the speeches. Anyone remember Reagan? The intrenched media attempted to slough him off as just a good speaker. Well, considering that attribute, Palin is a better speaker than Obama, and she can do it off the cuff as well as using a prepared document. You give Obama an unscripted question and he stammers for a half hour. Reagan never did that, nor does Palin. Biden tries to deliver a nonanswer. And the scrabbling from the lefties, Chapman has joined that group, continues. Because Palin's speech was so well delivered she blew Obama out of the water, they have decided to nit pick. The chosen talking point is that she did not mention issues such as the economy and healthcare and the solutions to those problems. Well, I have to admit Obama and Biden have mentioned both, but I have yet to hear a solution from either man. Apparantly, to please the Washington Chapman-style media that is what you do...in addition to being a Democrat. Sarah Palin delivers a better speech than Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi or any other leftty woman, and she has more exectutive experience that Clinton will ever have. Remember, Hillary may have lived in the White House for eight years, but she did nothing. The first lady is not an executive. She has no executive authority. By the way, neither does a community organizer.
Mr. Chapman, your bias is showing.

2 comments:

T-dog said...

This article is excellent reading. You hit the nail right on the head, Mr. Beers.
Sarah Palin is a great choice for VP.
(Who is Chapman?)

Bob Beers said...

Mr. Chapman is a so-called "conservative" collumnist at Townhall.com. Kind of like a low powered Thomas Sowell. His problem is that he doesn't like the idea of allowing citizens outside of the beltway power structure into the club.